Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AES cleanup fixes pt 1 for #179 #210

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

AES cleanup fixes pt 1 for #179 #210

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

jn80842
Copy link
Collaborator

@jn80842 jn80842 commented Dec 20, 2024

Three of the tasks from issue 179, cleaning up small issues to do with the AES spec.

Copy link
Contributor

@marsella marsella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks solid, thank you for addressing! I appreciate the coherent commits.

I have a few comments; the most important ones are about docs and naming in SBox -- the rest are mostly nitpicky.

One other top-level comments: please check off the boxes for the things you finished in #179!

Primitive/Symmetric/Cipher/Block/AES/SBox.cry Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Primitive/Symmetric/Cipher/Block/AES/SBox.cry Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Primitive/Symmetric/Cipher/Block/AES/SBox.cry Show resolved Hide resolved
Primitive/Symmetric/Cipher/Block/AES/Algorithm.cry Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Primitive/Symmetric/Cipher/Block/AES/Algorithm.cry Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@marsella marsella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you!

@jn80842 jn80842 merged commit 98f3e81 into master Jan 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@jn80842 jn80842 deleted the smallAES179 branch January 3, 2025 17:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants